EvidenceSheet

AC-19(4) Access Control for Mobile Devices | Restrictions for Classified Information

(a) Prohibit the use of unclassified mobile devices in facilities containing systems processing, storing, or transmitting classified information unless specifically permitted by the authorizing official; and (b) Enforce the following restrictions on individuals permitted by the authorizing official to use unclassified mobile devices in facilities containing systems processing, storing, or transmitting classified information: (1) Connection of unclassified mobile devices to classified systems is prohibited; (2) Connection of unclassified mobile devices to unclassified systems requires approval from the authorizing official; (3) Use of internal or external modems or wireless interfaces within the unclassified mobile devices is prohibited; and (4) Unclassified mobile devices and the information stored on those devices are subject to random reviews and inspections by organization-defined security officials, and if classified information is found, the incident handling policy is followed. (c) Restrict the connection of classified mobile devices to classified systems in accordance with organization-defined security policies.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, AC-19(4). The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

9
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • System audit records · Identity provider / directory
  • Test of Mechanisms prohibiting the use of internal or external modems or wireless interfaces with mobile devices · Endpoint management (MDM / EDR)

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Access control policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Incident handling policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing access control for mobile devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System design documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System configuration settings and associated documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Evidentiary documentation for random inspections and reviews of mobile devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices · AC-19(5) Access Control for Mobile Devices | Full Device or Container-based Encryption