03.14.02 Malicious Code Protection
Implement malicious code protection at system entry and exit points; update protection mechanisms; configure to perform periodic scans and real-time scans of files; address receipt of false positives.
Source: NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3, 03.14.02. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- EDR/AV deployment report · Endpoint management (MDM / EDR)
- Scan results · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Signature update evidence · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
none for this control
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- EDR not on Linux servers
- exclusions overly broad
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet03.14.01 Flaw Remediation · 03.14.03 Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives