EvidenceSheet

6.6.2 User access management

User registration and deregistration for people who administer or operate systems processing personal data must address compromise of their access credentials, deactivated or expired user identifiers must never be reissu

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence that identifiers on systems processing personal data are never reissued · Data governance / DLP tooling
  • Current user profile record supporting attribution of access and change · Document repository
  • Access review records · Identity provider / directory

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Registration and deregistration procedures covering credential compromise · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Documented split of identity and access management responsibility with customers, and the administrative means provided to them · Document repository

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

6.6.1 Business requirements of access control · 6.6.3 User responsibilities