EvidenceSheet

5.4 Management responsibilities

Managers are to insist that everyone working for the organization applies information security as the organization's policy, topic-specific policies and procedures lay down. Purpose: make sure managers grasp their own part in information security and act so that all staff know and carry out their security duties. Guidance: management shows visible backing for the policies, procedures and controls. Its duties include making sure people are briefed on their security role before they receive access to information and assets; are given written expectations for their role; are required to follow the policies; reach a level of awareness that matches their role (see 6.3); keep to the security terms of their employment contract or agreement and the expected ways of working; maintain the right security skills and qualifications through continuing education; have, where practical, a confidential route for reporting breaches of policy or procedure (whistleblowing), which may be anonymous or restrict knowledge of the reporter's identity to those handling the report; and are given enough resources and planning time to implement the security processes and controls.

Source: ISO/IEC 27002:2022, 5.4. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open ISO/IEC 27002:2022 in the compliance library.

ISO/IEC 27002 is guidance on the Annex A controls; certification is against ISO/IEC 27001. Use this set when your sheet follows the 27002 numbering.

6
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence that security briefings on roles and responsibilities occur before access is granted, such as onboarding checklists tied to access provisioning · Identity provider / directory
  • Records of continuing professional education for staff in security-relevant roles · Identity provider / directory

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Role-specific guidance documents setting out security expectations · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Signed employment contracts or agreements containing the security obligations · Vendor register / contract repository
  • A confidential or anonymous reporting channel for policy violations with its handling procedure · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Project plans or budgets showing resources and time allocated to security processes and controls · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

5.3 Segregation of duties · 5.5 Contact with authorities