EvidenceSheet

5.29 Information security during disruption

Requires the organisation to plan how information security will be maintained at an appropriate level while a disruption is under way.

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • The assessment of which security controls would be weakened or bypassed during disruption, and the compensating arrangements · Document repository
  • Evidence security requirements are part of continuity testing, not only recovery of function · Document repository
  • Records of emergency access arrangements, including how they are authorised, logged and withdrawn afterwards · Document repository
  • Post exercise or post event review confirming security was actually maintained · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Continuity plans showing how information security is maintained while the organisation is operating in a degraded or alternative mode · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

5.28 Collection of evidence · 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity