EvidenceSheet

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation

Requires the organisation to plan and prepare for incident handling ahead of time. Incident management processes, plus the roles and responsibilities attached to them, must be defined, put in place and communicated.

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence the process and roles were communicated to those who must act on them · Identity provider / directory
  • Preparation evidence, such as playbooks for likely incident types, contact lists and readiness of forensic and communication capability · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The incident management process, defining categories, severity, escalation and the decision authority at each level · Document repository
  • Documented roles and responsibilities for incident handling, including out of hours coverage and named deputies · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Records of exercises or simulations testing the plan, and the improvements arising · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

5.23 Information security for use of cloud services · 5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events