EvidenceSheet

5.14 Information transfer

Every kind of transfer facility, whether used inside the organization or with outside parties, is to be covered by rules, procedures or agreements for moving information. Purpose: keep information secure while it moves internally and to or from any external interested party. Guidance: a topic-specific transfer policy is set and shared with relevant parties; protection in transit reflects the classification of what is moved, and exchanges with third parties are governed by maintained transfer agreements that include authenticating the recipient (5.10). Transfer may be electronic, by physical media or spoken. For all forms the arrangements address: protection against interception, unauthorized access, copying, alteration, misdirection, destruction and denial of service, with access levels suited to the classification and extra measures such as encryption (8.24) for sensitive material; traceability and non-repudiation including chain of custody in transit; named contacts (owners, risk owners, security officers, custodians); incident responsibilities and liabilities, for instance lost media; an agreed, instantly understood labelling system (5.13); how dependable and available the transfer service is; acceptable use of transfer facilities (5.10); retention and disposal of business records including messages, noting local law; and other legal and contractual needs such as electronic signatures (5.31 to 5.34). Electronic transfer adds malware defence (8.7), protecting sensitive attachments, stopping misaddressed messages, approval before using public messaging, social, file-sharing or cloud services, stronger authentication over public networks, restrictions such as blocking automatic forwarding to external mail, advice against putting critical content in SMS or instant messages, and warnings about fax message stores and mis-programmed numbers. Physical media transfer adds responsibility for controlling and notifying dispatch and receipt, correct addressing, protective packaging per manufacturer guidance against heat, moisture and magnetic fields with minimum standards such as opaque envelopes, management-approved reliable couriers with identification standards and verification, tamper-evident or tamper-resistant containers by classification, approved transport providers by classification, and logs of content, protection, authorized recipients, handover and arrival times. Verbal transfer: remind people not to hold confidential conversations in public or on insecure channels, not to leave confidential voicemail, to ensure listeners are cleared to the right level, to use suitable rooms (closed doors, sound-proofing) and to open sensitive discussions by stating the classification and handling rules.

Source: ISO/IEC 27002:2022, 5.14. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open ISO/IEC 27002:2022 in the compliance library.

ISO/IEC 27002 is guidance on the Annex A controls; certification is against ISO/IEC 27001. Use this set when your sheet follows the 27002 numbering.

6
artefacts
2
held by a system
0
at each review
moderate
to go live
Cloud console / configuration management
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Email and messaging configurations such as encryption of sensitive attachments, blocking of automatic external forwarding and approval rules for public file-sharing or cloud services · Cloud console / configuration management
  • Media transfer logs recording contents, protection applied, authorized recipients and handover and receipt times · SIEM / log platform

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The topic-specific information transfer policy and its communication record · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Transfer agreements with third parties covering recipient authentication, protection levels, incident liability and labelling · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Approved courier and transport provider lists with identification and verification procedures · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Awareness material on verbal transfer, voicemail and messaging of confidential information · HR system / LMS

First move

Start with the 2 of 6 artefacts that already live in a system (Cloud console / configuration management); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

5.13 Labelling of information · 5.15 Access control