A.5.3 Segregation of duties
Duties and areas of responsibility that conflict with each other are to be kept apart. Purpose (stated in ISO/IEC 27002:2022): reduces the risk of fraud, error and circumvention of information security controls. As an Annex A reference control, it is compared with the controls determined in risk treatment (6.1.3 c) and recorded in the Statement of Applicability as included or excluded, with the justification and implementation status (6.1.3 d); implementation guidance is ISO/IEC 27002:2022 5.3.
Source: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.3. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open ISO/IEC 27001:2022 in the compliance library.
Clauses 4 to 10 are the management-system requirements: none of them can be excluded when an organisation claims conformity. The 93 Annex A controls are a reference set: one may be excluded with a justification in the Statement of Applicability. Certification bodies assess conformity; the evidence lists here are what auditors commonly ask for, not a list the standard prescribes.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Role definitions and a role conflict ruleset in the identity or ERP system · Identity provider / directory
- Output of automated or periodic conflict analysis and records of conflicts removed · Document repository
- Change and access request records showing requester, approver and implementer are different people · Identity provider / directory
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
none for this control
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Statement of Applicability entry for control A.5.3, showing inclusion or justified exclusion, implementation status and the risks it treats · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- A segregation of duties matrix identifying which conflicting duties the organization has chosen to separate · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Developers retain standing write access to production
- Conflict rules exist on paper but are not enforced in the access management tooling
- Small teams claim segregation is impossible and record no compensating control
- Role reassignments leave individuals holding both old and new conflicting roles
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetA.5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities · A.5.4 Management responsibilities