EvidenceSheet

164.314(a)(2)(iii) Business Associate Contracts with Subcontractors

The requirements of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section apply to the contract or other arrangement between a business associate and a subcontractor required by 164.308(b)(4) in the same manner as such requirements apply

8
artefacts
0
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Records of subcontractor incident notifications · Document repository
  • Subcontractor risk assessment results · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Annual subcontractor review · Document repository
  • Evidence that BA enforces same requirements on subcontractors · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Subcontractor BAA template aligned to 164.314(a)(2)(i) · Document repository
  • Executed subcontractor BAAs · Document repository
  • Subcontractor inventory with ePHI scope · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Termination clauses for subcontractor non-compliance · HR system / LMS

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

164.314(a)(2)(ii) Other Arrangements (Government) · 164.314(b)(1) Requirements for Group Health Plans (Standard)