EvidenceSheet

Art.6 Lawfulness of processing

Process personal data only where at least one lawful basis applies: the data subject's consent, necessity for a contract with the data subject or pre-contractual steps at their request, compliance with a legal obligation

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Legitimate interests assessments showing the interest pursued, the necessity test and the balancing against the data subject's rights · Data governance / DLP tooling
  • Compatibility assessments for each secondary use, covering the five factors Article 6(4) names · Document repository
  • Evidence that the basis stated to the data subject in the privacy information matches the one recorded internally · Data governance / DLP tooling

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • A lawful basis recorded per processing activity, not per system or per department · Document repository
  • The Union or Member State provision cited where the basis is legal obligation or public task · Document repository

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

Art.5 Principles relating to processing of personal data · Art.7 Conditions for consent