EvidenceSheet

Art.33 Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority

On becoming aware of a personal data breach, notify it to the competent supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after becoming aware, unless the breach is unlikely to result

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • The internal breach register covering all breaches including those assessed as not notifiable, with the risk assessment recorded for each · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • The methodology used to decide notifiability, and evidence it was applied rather than the decision reached first and documented after · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The awareness timestamp per incident and the basis for it, since the 72 hours runs from awareness and not from confirmation or containment · HR system / LMS
  • Notifications as submitted, checked against the four content elements Article 33(3) requires · Document repository
  • Processor contract terms requiring notification without undue delay, and the notification times actually achieved · Vendor register / contract repository

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

Art.32 Security of processing · Art.34 Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject