EvidenceSheet

Art.11 Processing which does not require identification

Where the purposes of processing do not or no longer require the controller to identify the data subject, the controller is not obliged to maintain, acquire or process additional information solely in order to comply wit

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
0
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Analysis of which datasets are processed without the ability to identify the individual, and the basis for that conclusion · Document repository
  • The documented position on why additional identifying information is not held, showing it was not discarded to avoid rights requests · Document repository
  • The response given to a data subject whose request cannot be met for want of identification, including the invitation to supply identifying information · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • The procedure for accepting and using additional information a data subject supplies to enable identification · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

Art.10 Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions · Art.12 Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights