EvidenceSheet

SA-2 Allocation of Resources

Determine the high-level information security and privacy requirements for the system or system service in mission and business process planning; determine, document and allocate the resources required to protect the system or system service as part of the organizational capital planning and investment control process; and establish a discrete line item for information security and privacy in organizational programming and budgeting documentation.

Source: FedRAMP High (NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baseline), SA-2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open FedRAMP High (NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baseline) in the compliance library.

A FedRAMP baseline is a subset of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, enhancements included.

6
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Records of review of the allocation when requirements or the system change across the system development life cycle · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Mission and business process planning documentation recording the high-level information security and privacy requirements determined for the system or system service · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Capital planning and investment control submission or business case showing the resources determined, documented and allocated to protect the system or system service · Document repository
  • Programming and budgeting documentation showing a discrete line item for information security and privacy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Approved budget or spend plan carrying that line item, with its approval record · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System security and privacy plan section recording the allocated resources and the basis for the amount · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

SA-1 Policy and Procedures · SA-3 System Development Life Cycle