PS-2 Position Risk Designation
Assign risk designation to positions; review and update at least every three years.
Source: FedRAMP High (NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baseline), PS-2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open FedRAMP High (NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baseline) in the compliance library.
A FedRAMP baseline is a subset of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, enhancements included.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Background screening completion records by role tier · HR system / LMS
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Termination and transfer access removal evidence within SLA · HR system / LMS
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- SSP PS-2 statement describing position risk designations and the three year review of designations · Document repository
- Position risk designation list with the last review date · Document repository
- Personnel security policy and position risk designation matrix · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Sanctions policy with documented application history · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Termination access removal exceeds documented SLA
- Sanctions applied informally without HR documentation
- Contractor screening relies on vendor attestation without sampling
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet