EvidenceSheet

CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution

Provide for recovery and reconstitution of system to known state within RTO.

6
artefacts
0
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Annual tabletop and full failover test reports · Backup / DR tooling
  • Alternate processing site contract and capacity attestation · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Restoration test logs with success criteria signed off · Backup / DR tooling

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Control implementation statement for CP-10 citing the system mission and inheritance from common controls · Document repository
  • Backup schedule, retention, and offsite or immutable copy evidence · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Business impact analysis identifying critical systems · Document repository

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

CP-9(8) System Backup | Cryptographic Protection. Implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of [Assignment: organization-defined backup information] · CP-10(2) System Recovery and Reconstitution | Transaction Recovery. Implement transaction recovery for systems that are transaction-based