Art.25 Testing of ICT tools and systems
The testing programme provides, proportionately under Article 4(2), for appropriate tests such as penetration and end-to-end tests, performance and compatibility testing, scenario-based tests, review of source code where feasible, scans and vulnerability assessments, analysis of open-source components, gap analyses, assessments of network security, reviews of physical security, and questionnaires with scanning software. Central securities depositories and central counterparties also run vulnerability assessments before deploying or redeploying applications or infrastructure components, and ICT services behind critical or important functions (Art. 25(2)). Microenterprises plan their tests by pairing a risk-based approach with strategic planning, weighing the resources and time spent against urgency, risk type, criticality and their capacity to take calculated risks (Art. 25(3)). The at least yearly testing of systems supporting critical or important functions is an Article 24(6) duty on entities other than microenterprises.
Source: DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554), Art.25. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) in the compliance library.
Applies to the financial entities listed in Article 2. Many duties are lighter or absent for microenterprises and for the entities in Article 16(1); each statement says where. Article 19 carries the reporting clocks of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301, Article 5.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Vulnerability scan and penetration test reports with dates and scope · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Pre-deployment vulnerability assessment records (central securities depositories and central counterparties only) · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Test catalogue showing which Article 25(1) test types are used for which systems and why · Document repository
- Microenterprise ICT test plan showing how risk and resources were balanced · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Only one test type used for every system
- Source code never reviewed where review was feasible
- Pre-deployment vulnerability assessment skipped by a CSD or CCP
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetArt.24 General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing · Art.26 Advanced testing of ICT tools, systems and processes based on TLPT