IVS-02 Capacity and Resource Planning
Plan and monitor resource availability, quality and capacity so the system delivers the performance the business requires.
4
artefacts
1
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
SIEM / log platform
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Monitoring output for availability, quality and capacity · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Evidence capacity planning influenced a provisioning decision · Identity provider / directory
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Capacity plans with the business performance requirement stated · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Thresholds and the action taken when they are approached · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Start with the 1 of 4 artefacts that already live in a system (SIEM / log platform); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.
Common gaps auditors find
- Monitoring in place with no plan, so capacity is managed reactively
- Performance requirement never stated, so adequacy cannot be judged
- Thresholds set with no defined response
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetIVS-01 Infrastructure and Virtualization Security Policy and Procedures · IVS-03 Network Security