IAM-06 User Access Provisioning
Run an access provisioning process that authorises each grant, records it, and communicates changes to data and asset access to the affected parties.
4
artefacts
1
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
Identity provider / directory
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Provisioning records showing requester, approver and date · Identity provider / directory
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Evidence access changes were communicated · Identity provider / directory
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- The provisioning procedure with the authorisation step · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Coverage across systems, not only the central directory · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Start with the 1 of 4 artefacts that already live in a system (Identity provider / directory); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.
Common gaps auditors find
- Access granted by direct request to an administrator outside the process
- Approvals recorded without identifying the approver
- Provisioning in secondary systems done informally
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetIAM-05 Least Privilege · IAM-07 User Access Changes and Revocation