GRC-08 Special Interest Groups
Contact is set up and kept going with special interest groups focused on cloud and with other relevant bodies, as suits the business context.
Source: CSA CCM v4.1, GRC-08. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open CSA CCM v4.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.1 adds 11 controls (among them API security, log sanitisation and a service bill of materials) and renumbers several domains. CSA accepts v4.0.x during its transition; if your STAR assessment is still on v4.0.1, check the numbering against it.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Records of participation such as meeting attendance or shared advisories · HR system / LMS
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- List of memberships in cloud and security interest groups · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Named staff responsible for each relationship · Document repository
- Information received and acted upon · Document repository
- Policy requiring the contacts · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Memberships lapsed
- Nobody responsible for engagement
- Information received but not acted on
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetGRC-07 Information System Regulatory Mapping · HRS-01 Background Screening Policy and Procedures