DSP-18 Disclosure Notification
The service provider puts in place, and explains to its customers, a procedure for handling and answering law enforcement requests to disclose personal data, in line with applicable law.
Source: CSA CCM v4.1, DSP-18. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open CSA CCM v4.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.1 adds 11 controls (among them API security, log sanitisation and a service bill of materials) and renumbers several domains. CSA accepts v4.0.x during its transition; if your STAR assessment is still on v4.0.1, check the numbering against it.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Request log with legal review and approvals · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Legal counsel review records · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Law enforcement request handling procedure · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Customer-facing description of the procedure (for example in a trust centre or transparency report) · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Transparency report figures · Document repository
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Procedure exists internally but customers are not told about it
- Requests handled without legal review
- No log of requests received
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet