CEK-14 Key Destruction
Processes, procedures and technical measures are defined, implemented and evaluated so that cryptographic keys are securely destroyed once no longer needed, taking legal and regulatory requirements into account.
Source: CSA CCM v4.1, CEK-14. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open CSA CCM v4.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.1 adds 11 controls (among them API security, log sanitisation and a service bill of materials) and renumbers several domains. CSA accepts v4.0.x during its transition; if your STAR assessment is still on v4.0.1, check the numbering against it.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Destruction logs for sampled keys · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
none for this control
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Key destruction procedure and approval workflow · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Access list of who may destroy or restore keys · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Criteria for when keys may exist outside a secure environment · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Keys deleted without approval or logging
- Too many people can destroy keys
- Destroyed keys still recoverable from backups
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet