MA.L2-3.7.6 Maintenance Personnel
Supervise maintenance personnel who do not hold the access authorization normally required, for the duration of their work.
3
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Supervision or escort records naming the supervisor · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Procedure requiring supervision of unauthorized maintenance personnel · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Authorization status check performed before work begins · Document repository
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- Vendor technicians left unattended
- Escort recorded at entry but not throughout the work
- No check of whether the technician is authorized
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetMA.L2-3.7.5 Nonlocal Maintenance · MP.L2-3.8.1 Media Protection