EvidenceSheet
CMMC 2.0 · Identification and Authentication

IA.L2-3.5.4 Replay-Resistant Authentication

Use authentication mechanisms that resist replay for network access to both privileged and non privileged accounts.

Source: CMMC 2.0, IA.L2-3.5.4. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open CMMC 2.0 in the compliance library.

3
artefacts
1
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
Identity provider / directory
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Authentication protocol configuration demonstrating replay resistance · Identity provider / directory

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence deprecated protocols vulnerable to replay are disabled · Identity provider / directory

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Coverage across network accessible services · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Start with the 1 of 3 artefacts that already live in a system (Identity provider / directory); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

IA.L2-3.5.3 Multifactor Authentication · IA.L2-3.5.5 Identifier Reuse