EvidenceSheet
CIS Controls v8.1 · CIS Control 7: Continuous Vulnerability Management

7.1 Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process

Write down and keep current how the enterprise finds, assesses and handles vulnerabilities across its assets, and revisit that document every year or after any significant change that could affect it. Implementation Groups: IG1, IG2 and IG3 (part of the IG1 essential cyber hygiene baseline, so every enterprise applies it). Asset type: Documentation. Security function: Govern.

Source: CIS Controls v8.1, 7.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open CIS Controls v8.1 in the compliance library.

Scope: Implementation Groups: IG1, IG2, IG3. Security function: Govern; asset type: Documentation.

Each safeguard shows its Implementation Groups. IG1 is the essential baseline for every enterprise, IG2 adds to it, IG3 is all 153. Version 8.1 adds the Govern security function and asks for more processes to be documented; numbering is unchanged from v8.

3
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Annual review and approval record · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Approved vulnerability management procedure naming scope, tools, roles and timelines · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Asset scope statement linked to the asset register · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control · 7.2 Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process