§1798.185(a)(16) Automated Decisionmaking Technology Access and Opt-Out
Consumers have rights regarding businesses use of automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT), including profiling. Businesses must, per CPPA regulations: provide meaningful information about the logic involved and a desc
5
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Records of ADMT outputs and consumer interactions · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- ADMT inventory and use-case classification · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Pre-use notice describing logic and outcomes · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Opt-out and access mechanisms specific to ADMT · Document repository
- Human review/appeal procedure · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- No ADMT inventory
- Logic disclosures absent or unintelligible
- No opt-out workflow
- Profiling not flagged as in scope
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet