SEC11-BP07 Regularly assess security properties of the pipelines
Treat the CI CD pipeline itself as a sensitive workload and review its IAM roles, secrets handling, runner isolation and tamper resistance regularly.
Source: AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, SEC11-BP07. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- IAM role review for pipelines · Identity provider / directory
- Self hosted runner hardening evidence · Source control / CI pipeline
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Pipeline threat model · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- OIDC trust policies · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- pipeline roles have AdministratorAccess
- long lived deploy keys
- shared runner pool with no isolation
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetSEC11-BP06 Deploy software programmatically · SEC11-BP08 Build a program that embeds security ownership in workload teams