SEC07-BP02 Apply data protection controls based on data sensitivity
Apply protection controls proportionate to each defined sensitivity level, with published guidance on approved storage services, locations and required configuration per class.
Source: AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, SEC07-BP02. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Per-class handling guidance naming approved services and configurations · Cloud console / configuration management
- Policy-as-code or guardrails enforcing the per-class configuration · Cloud console / configuration management
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Evidence of periodic checks that controls match classification · Data governance / DLP tooling
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Exception register for data held outside approved locations · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- single protection level applied to all data regardless of sensitivity
- guidance published but not enforced by any guardrail
- sensitive data found in stores approved only for lower classes
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetSEC07-BP01 Understand your data classification scheme · SEC07-BP03 Automate identification and classification