CPS 230 para 43 Tailored test scenarios including material service provider disruption
The testing program must reflect the entity's material risks and use varied severe yet plausible scenarios, among them disruption to services from material service providers and situations where contingency arrangements have to be used. APRA may require an APRA-determined scenario to be included in an exercise for an entity or class of entities.
Source: APRA CPS 230, CPS 230 para 43. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open APRA CPS 230 in the compliance library.
Applies to APRA-regulated entities.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Exercise records for scenarios involving a material service provider outage · Document repository
- Evidence of contingency arrangements invoked in tests · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Scenario library mapped to the entity's material risks · Document repository
- Any APRA-specified scenario and the exercise results for it · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- No scenario covers failure of a material service provider
- Scenarios generic and unrelated to the risk profile
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetCPS 230 para 42 Systematic BCP testing program with an annual exercise · CPS 230 para 44 Annual BCP update